Showing posts with label Vanderbilt University. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vanderbilt University. Show all posts

Monday, August 5, 2013

Of pop art and holobiont

'Nasonia' by Robert M. Brucker, 2013. A digital homage to Warhol's 'Marilyn' series of screen prints.
We recently published the major part of my thesis in the journal Science -- "The Hologenomic Basis of Speciation: Gut Bacteria Cause Hybrid Lethality in the Genus Nasonia."We were fortunate to be promoted to a Science Express article, which means that it is available online well before the final print, which should be around August-September (we don't have the final date yet). When we were in the process of submitting the final documents to the editor we included a few options for potential cover art. Although we may not be selected for the cover, the process did make me think about our work from an art history perspective.

It started when I called my mother, a retired high school art teacher. I asked her for recommendations for a visual way to represent the scientific story we were telling. She had come to my thesis defense, has heard me talk about my work, and has printed off my papers to put on their coffee table--she does not understand it all but she has a surface knowledge of what I do. After some thought, she recommended that I try imitating an Andy Warhol. I thanked her for her advice, but inside I felt that she did not quite understand what it was I was looking for in a concept image. I wanted something that could depict the complexity and the universality of the hologenome--the idea that the genome and the microbiome are linked in the evolution of any animal species. I could not see how nauseously vibrant screen prints was relevant. However, sleeping on it always helps me. The next morning, as I was brushing my teeth, it hit me--my mother was on to a deeper connection with my science than I realized. You see, Andy Warhol is one of the most iconic, great american artists, whom pushed the conventional boundaries of art into the familiar and ordinary. His work was pivotal to the Pop Art movement of mid 1950's-60's America. Much like the pop art movement, the hologenome theory is controversial within the field of evolution, yet it is easily connectable to our understanding of what makes a species.

For a little perspective, the pop art movement reveled in an anti-traditional and anti-esthetic means to present familiar everyday objects, events, and celebrities. Artists of this movement imitated the styles of commercial art and mass media to push away from the unfamiliar and almost-elitist abstract expressionism movement (artists such as Jackson Pollock). The tradition of art before the pop art movement set the artist and the concept behind the artists work as a superior form of experiential being, an expression of human emotion that was meant only to be reviled through exploration of the work. Pop art on the other hand was obvious, mashing every day objects and the emotions attached to those within the artist's piece. This push towards the common connection between the art and the viewer challenged the definition of what Art is. Since Art can now include the common and the surreal, connect emotion to the mundane, then Art can be almost anything. For example, Warhol's soup can prints represent the disposable, mass-produced American life of the era, but also something that has a life of its own.

The hologenome theory of evolution includes the microbial organisms as an extension of the host's genes. This theory is a concept that challenges the definition of a species, pushing it beyond the boundaries of the cell wall. The traditional understanding of a species are the gene-gene interactions between DNA and/or cytoplasm (mitochondria and chloroplasts) that limit the reproductive success between species. This has been the dogma of evolutionary biology for nearly a century, and with good reason. Gene-gene interactions likely the primary mechanisms that isolate species; however, there is a greater genetic diversity within a species if one includes the genes found in the microbiome. The expansion of available genetic diversity within a species provides new opportunities for selection to drive speciation. The presence of microorganisms is common and required for the health and development of the host organism they live in/on.

We take for granted the omnipresence of the microbes around us. Their life is as much apart of our own existence, but yet, until the hologenome theory, they played little part in our understanding of species. The same is true for our dependancies on consumerism and the celebrated individual as an unavoidable part the modern society but was not a part of our artistic dialogue until the pop art movement. Bacteria are often considered part of the environment, and any influence they have on a species is no different then any other organism-organism interaction, like say a predator and prey. But because it is impossible to have a naturally occurring organism without any microbiome, bacteria are essential to the existence of that species. Pop art parallels this, ordinary objects and pop culture references where not considered high art because they were part of everyday society, but yet art is a reflection of our society--neither exists with out each other. Our microbes are as much part of our identity as a species as Marilyn Monroe. The art and beauty of living surrounds us, though in mass produced quantities it represents what we are and where we are going.

For more information on the hologenome topic:
This video by Richard Jefferson on the definitions of the hologenome
A review of the hologenome thory by Eugene Rosenberg, Gil Sharon, and Ilana Zilber- Rosenberg.
Our review article, Speciation by Symbiosis giving examples as to how bacteria influence barriers between species (pdf).
Seth Bordenstein has written/vloged about the hologenome and speciation by symbiosis.

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

3MT and 10,000 views

After my dissertation defense I realized that the live feed was actually not of my powerpoint slides but the isight camera on my computer. Sorry abou that, 50+ min of me infront of the camera talking was not what I had in mind. I am working on uploading the slides with the audio of my defense, but in the mean time I have something much more digestible.

On March 22, The Graduate Student Council at Vanderbilt University held its first Three Minute Thesis (3MT) Competition. The 3MT stated at the University of Queensland as a means to have graduates students develop the skills to effectively explain their research to a general audience, in three minutes. If you have a few minutes to spare, check out some of their presenters from this year: here. The competition has spread throughout Australia and New Zealand. The finalists are really impressive and worth the 3 minutes of their video.

Vanderbilt is one of only a handful of universities in the US that is holding 3MT competitions. I submitted my abstract and was one of the 72 selected semifinalists. So, only a few days after my actual defense, I was condensing my thesis into a short three minute segment.

The rules were fairly straight forward.
  1. Only one static (no animations) powerpoint slide
  2. You only have three minutes to speak, if you are one second over you are disqualified
  3. No costumes, props, or music
Really it is just you, standing there giving your 'elevator' pitch.

I really enjoyed my time at the competition. The quality of presentations were really top notch. I'm not sure if if the grad student council recorded any of them, but perhaps they will start doing so in the years to come. In the mean time, I recorded my 3MT for people to see. I would welcome any feedback on how to improve it. Please feel free to leave comments on this post or on the youtube channel directly. 

Jump to the 5:55 if you just want to hear the 3MT




Also, I have received over 10,000 views to my science illustration pages since June of 2012. That's really cool! I appreciate all those who have looked through my work. I have received several requests to provide instructional posts on how to do some of the illustrations and art. So, in the next few week I will be planning out some instructional videos of this nature--a how to communicate science and science art. Also, I will be going over some of the tools and tricks I have found useful in programs like PowerPoint, Excel, Illustrator, and Photoshop.